🔗 Share this article

Deductibles. In-network. Non-preferred providers. Concierge medical services. Out-of-pocket expenses. Co-payment. Co-insurance. Insurance consultants. Coverage agents. Healthcare consultants. Affordable Care Act. Health Maintenance Organization. Preferred Provider Organization. EPO. POS. HDHP. HSA. Flexible Spending Account. Health Reimbursement Arrangement. Explanation of Benefits. Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act. Small Business Health Options Program. Individual coverage. Dependent coverage. Premium tax credits.

Confused? You should be. Who comprehends all this stuff? Not the typical entrepreneur. Nor the typical employee. Choosing the appropriate healthcare insurance for our business – or for households – appears to require it requires a PhD in healthcare.

Our Medical System Isn't Just Complicated, It's Costly

Based on a recent study, the average family pays $twenty-seven thousand annually for their health insurance (increasing by 6% compared to last year). The average company healthcare expense is expected to exceed $seventeen thousand for each worker by 2026, a 9.5% jump compared to 2025.

Now the government has ceased functioning because partisan disputes regarding tax credits which analysts predict could cause premium increases up to 100% for numerous US citizens.

When Might We Seriously Consider National Health Insurance?

How soon might we seriously consider universal healthcare coverage in the United States? I'm convinced we're getting closer since this situation is unsustainable.

I'm not suggesting government-run medicine. I'm proposing for our current Medicare system – an established insurance framework – merely extend to include all citizens. Our infrastructure remains intact. How medical professionals receive payment would change. Trust me, they will adjust.

How Universal Coverage Could Function

A national health insurance program would require payments from employees and employers. In comparable systems, a worker earning average wages must contribute about 5.3% toward medical coverage. Their employer must contribute about 13.75%.

Does this appear expensive? Not if you contrast it to what average American pays. I can name dozens of clients who are easily contributing between 8% to 15% of their employee wages for medical benefits. Remember that with comprehensive systems, those payments also cover retirement benefits, sick pay, parental benefits and job loss protection along with supporting healthcare facilities. When including those costs compared with what we pay on retirement programs, unemployment insurance and vacation benefits, the difference decreases.

Execution in the US

In the US, universal healthcare funding would increase existing Medicare taxes, a framework already established. It ought to be income-adjusted – those at higher income levels would contribute higher amounts than those earning less. There would be both an employee and employer contribution. Similar to much of our government's military, IT, welfare services and transportation services, the system could be managed to third-party administrators instead of federal agencies.

Advantages for Small Businesses

Universal healthcare coverage represents a significant advantage for small businesses such as my company. It would place small companies in equal competition with our larger competitors that can pay for better plans. It would render administration significantly simpler (automatic payroll withholding processed similarly to social security and healthcare taxes, instead of separate payments to benefit firms and coverage administrators).

It would enable it easier for us to budget our yearly costs, instead of going through the complex (and fruitless) process of bargaining with major insurers required annually each year. Because it's simplified, there would exist a better understanding of coverage among workers – as opposed to the current system where they have to decipher the complications of current options. Additionally there would definitely exist less liability for companies since we wouldn't would be privy to workers' health histories for purposes of risk assessment and alternative plans.

Free-Market Viewpoint

I'm as pro-market as possible. But I've learned that public institutions has a significant role in society, including national security to supporting needed infrastructure. Providing healthcare to all via universal healthcare enhances our economy's infrastructure. It represents superior, simpler approach for entrepreneurs which hire more than half of the country's workers and fund half the economic output. It enables for workers to be healthier, come to work more often and increase productivity.

Considering Challenges

Are there a million considerations I'm not addressing? Of course there are. Given rising medical expenses experienced recently, it's evident that current healthcare legislation isn't functioning very well. I understand that we're not a compact European nation where big changes are easier to implement. However extending universal Medicare, despite the additional taxes that would be incurred, would still be a superior and more affordable strategy both for managing medical expenses and ensuring coverage to everyone.

Need for Honest Assessment

As Americans, we need to tone down our own arrogance. America's medical care isn't so great. The US places well below many other countries in healthcare quality globally, according to major studies. Maybe one bright spot in this current situation could be that we undertake serious examination in the mirror and agree that big changes are necessary.